Page 51 of 279 FirstFirst ... 41495051525361101151 ... LastLast
Results 801 to 816 of 4464

Thread: Offseason Roster Thread 2016-17

  1. #801
    MVP Jonn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    In Shambles
    Posts
    11,829
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,385 Times in 980 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by L54 View Post
    Glory's point is right. Dexter Fowler won't come to Toronto to play a corner spot unless they're the highest bidder. Are there really people who don't think that's true?
    I said that like a week ago but ok

  2. #802
    All Star L54's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    'Merica
    Posts
    4,039
    Thanks
    538
    Thanked 1,318 Times in 837 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonn View Post
    I said that like a week ago but ok
    Congrats John your super smart

  3. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to L54 For This Useful Post:

    agrushcow (10-25-2016),BTS (10-25-2016),GD (10-25-2016)

  4. #803
    All Star Terminator's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    4,367
    Thanks
    1,542
    Thanked 1,399 Times in 866 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonn View Post
    I said that like a week ago but ok
    Lol do you think we keep track of your posts?

  5. #804
    MVP
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,186
    Thanks
    211
    Thanked 637 Times in 506 Posts
    I cant wait for the offseason to start. Holy crap, this stretch is awful, but I never realized how awful.

    I wonder if someone in Rogers had a discussion with Shapiro along the lines of we need to keep the TV ratings coming. I mean 1 million a night numbers for 162 nights plus playoffs. Regardless of the FMV of rights, no one is going to want to go back to 300-400K days. Pressure is coming,
    Goodbye AA.

  6. #805
    Blue Chip Prospect
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    916
    Thanks
    18
    Thanked 63 Times in 53 Posts
    If extra salary is gonna be available, do you guys think it would be worth taking on some potentially bad money like James Shields and David Robertson if it meant getting Adam Eaton for a lesser package. Melky could be another guy they would would want to unload.

  7. #806
    MVP
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    9,339
    Thanks
    341
    Thanked 2,000 Times in 1,490 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ziggyy108 View Post
    If extra salary is gonna be available, do you guys think it would be worth taking on some potentially bad money like James Shields and David Robertson if it meant getting Adam Eaton for a lesser package. Melky could be another guy they would would want to unload.
    I suspect they'd probably eat some of Robertson's salary rather than lessen a return (which wouldn't make sense for where they are).

  8. #807
    Moderator KingKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    15,779
    Thanks
    13,057
    Thanked 5,378 Times in 3,443 Posts
    Anyone remember when Curtis Granderson pushed Brett Gardner to LF?
    "We don't have to plan for a rebuild. But all 30 teams have to stay agile, and have to understand that we're dealing with human beings, and these assets to organizations are human and change and evolve. I think what we've tried to do is become more flexible and agile, and to sustain championships is to build from within."

  9. #808
    All Star
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    3,713
    Thanks
    38
    Thanked 378 Times in 267 Posts
    It would be nice to get some sort of sense of what Rogers is willing to spend on payroll. The discussion around what the club should do will change in many people's eyes if projected payroll is around 140, 150, 160 or 170. I hope the Blue Jays raise payroll parameters, but I'm not convinced they will.

  10. #809
    MVP
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    9,339
    Thanks
    341
    Thanked 2,000 Times in 1,490 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by saskjayfan View Post
    It would be nice to get some sort of sense of what Rogers is willing to spend on payroll. The discussion around what the club should do will change in many people's eyes if projected payroll is around 140, 150, 160 or 170. I hope the Blue Jays raise payroll parameters, but I'm not convinced they will.
    It seems pretty likely that they will. They're gonna really want to capitalize on the renewed fan interest. I would expect probably 160M, but it would be nice if that was a little flexible for the right fits.

  11. #810
    DONOR
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Sault Ste. Marie
    Posts
    3,886
    Thanks
    469
    Thanked 958 Times in 631 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Abomination View Post
    It seems pretty likely that they will. They're gonna really want to capitalize on the renewed fan interest. I would expect probably 160M, but it would be nice if that was a little flexible for the right fits.
    I'm not certain that Shapiro and Atkins would even spend 160 if they had it.

  12. #811
    MVP Jonn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    In Shambles
    Posts
    11,829
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,385 Times in 980 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by L54 View Post
    Congrats John your super smart
    Thanks man!

  13. #812
    All Star Terminator's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    4,367
    Thanks
    1,542
    Thanked 1,399 Times in 866 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by saskjayfan View Post
    It would be nice to get some sort of sense of what Rogers is willing to spend on payroll. The discussion around what the club should do will change in many people's eyes if projected payroll is around 140, 150, 160 or 170. I hope the Blue Jays raise payroll parameters, but I'm not convinced they will.
    Well he said not top 5 but he said they should be in the next 5 (6-10). Based on 2016 that would put them between 147 million and 167 million.

  14. #813
    Hall of Famer burlingtonbandit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    15,462
    Thanks
    670
    Thanked 1,838 Times in 1,338 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by saskjayfan View Post
    It would be nice to get some sort of sense of what Rogers is willing to spend on payroll. The discussion around what the club should do will change in many people's eyes if projected payroll is around 140, 150, 160 or 170. I hope the Blue Jays raise payroll parameters, but I'm not convinced they will.
    Atkins saying the club hasn't received the payroll number yet scares me. You would think they should now by now given FA is getting close.

  15. #814
    All Star THANOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Bowmanville, ON
    Posts
    4,415
    Thanks
    2,958
    Thanked 428 Times in 320 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Grant77 View Post
    I'm not certain that Shapiro and Atkins would even spend 160 if they had it.
    They could, based on internal risk tolerant extensions. I'm thinking extensions to the likes of JD, Stroman, Sanchez, and Osuna; combined with RFA signings.

  16. #815
    Big Leaguer bronson44's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,866
    Thanks
    836
    Thanked 728 Times in 365 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by saskjayfan View Post
    It would be nice to get some sort of sense of what Rogers is willing to spend on payroll. The discussion around what the club should do will change in many people's eyes if projected payroll is around 140, 150, 160 or 170. I hope the Blue Jays raise payroll parameters, but I'm not convinced they will.
    I think they will. The budget will be requested by Shapiro after he picks the best off season plan proposed to him by Atkins and staff. Atkins has stated they expect a higher payroll so I'm sure the proposals will all reflect that and I really believe Rogers will be pretty amenable to whatever they ask for. I have a feeling Shapiro can be pretty impressive in a boardroom and I'm sure their ask will be properly backed up by the numbers. I'm damn glad we have this FO in place.

  17. #816
    DONOR
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Sault Ste. Marie
    Posts
    3,886
    Thanks
    469
    Thanked 958 Times in 631 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by THANOS View Post
    They could, based on internal risk tolerant extensions. I'm thinking extensions to the likes of JD, Stroman, Sanchez, and Osuna; combined with RFA signings.
    I'm not against any of those extensions, but they would have a minimal impact on the 2017 payroll.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Grant77 For This Useful Post:

    Spanky99 (10-26-2016)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •