• BAL 9
    BOS 11
    Final
    1:05 PM ET
  • MIA 0
    NYM 5
    Final
    1:05 PM ET
  • NYM 0
    WSH 6
    Final
    1:10 PM ET
  • LAD 2
    CWS 4
    In Progress
    Bottom 7th
  • SF 11
    CIN 2
    In Progress
    Top 8th
  • TEX 4
    COL 3
    In Progress
    Top 6th
  • OAK 2
    KC 9
    In Progress
    End 7th
  • ARI 0
    LAA 4
    In Progress
    Middle 6th
  • SD 7
    SEA 0
    In Progress
    Middle 6th
  • ATL 0
    DET 0
    In Progress
    Middle 1st
  • PIT 0
    MIN 0
    In Progress
    Middle 1st
  • HOU 0
    STL 0
    In Progress
    Top 1st
  • TOR 0
    PHI 0
    In Progress
    Top 1st
  • CLE
    CHC
    Preview
    9:10 PM ET
Page 244 of 309 FirstFirst ... 144194234242243244245246254294 ... LastLast
Results 3,889 to 3,904 of 4929

Thread: Offseason Roster Thread 2016-17

  1. #3889
    MVP
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,339
    Thanks
    215
    Thanked 642 Times in 510 Posts
    I hate Bruce more than anyone Average bat with horrible D but even I would agree with a move that would bring a prospect back and get rid of that lug Smoak

  2. #3890
    MVP
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    9,814
    Thanks
    406
    Thanked 2,110 Times in 1,573 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ziggyy108 View Post
    I would take Bruce + a prospect for Smoak
    I'd probably do Bruce for Smoak straight up. You'd be getting Bruce for just under 9M this year, plus saving Smoak's 4M next year.

  3. #3891
    Top 100 Prospect
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    624
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 40 Times in 34 Posts
    Aren't Flores and Duda still on the mets for 1b ?

  4. #3892
    Prospect
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    282
    Thanks
    17
    Thanked 68 Times in 46 Posts
    They did lose James Loney at 1B, and he's pretty comparable to Smoak. Except Smoak is a switch hitter. I can see the Mets taking him for depth.

  5. #3893
    All Star
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    3,954
    Thanks
    247
    Thanked 835 Times in 557 Posts
    Smoak for Bruce would be a good deal. At least Bruce can actually hit RHP.

  6. #3894
    MVP Stangstag's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    7,257
    Thanks
    249
    Thanked 1,422 Times in 965 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Abomination View Post
    I'd probably do Bruce for Smoak straight up. You'd be getting Bruce for just under 9M this year, plus saving Smoak's 4M next year.
    Same. Bruce is actually a useful lefty bat who can play the OF (albeit, very poorly). Much more useful to this team than Justin Smoak.

  7. #3895
    Top 100 Prospect
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    624
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 40 Times in 34 Posts
    Why do the mets need a 1bman

  8. #3896
    Hall of Famer Atothe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    14,152
    Thanks
    2,780
    Thanked 1,891 Times in 1,327 Posts
    You guys wanna add a horrible defender who is making more money than the guy you're trading? I'd rather roll with Carrera

  9. #3897
    Hall of Famer Atothe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    14,152
    Thanks
    2,780
    Thanked 1,891 Times in 1,327 Posts
    Jays should just wait until 25 man rosters have to be set and make a trade then

  10. #3898
    Blue Chip Prospect
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    938
    Thanks
    86
    Thanked 436 Times in 242 Posts
    I don't want Bruce under any circumstance I can think of.

  11. #3899
    Big Leaguer reedjohnsonfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    2,531
    Thanks
    216
    Thanked 292 Times in 219 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Atothe View Post
    You guys wanna add a horrible defender who is making more money than the guy you're trading? I'd rather roll with Carrera
    Ya, Bruce is trash IMO. 30 HR and not much else.

  12. #3900
    Big Leaguer reedjohnsonfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    2,531
    Thanks
    216
    Thanked 292 Times in 219 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeM View Post
    I don't want Bruce under any circumstance I can think of.
    If they're giving him away maybe he's worth a look as a last resort. But in no way should they get him, a couple relievers (not the ones who signed) and think they had a successful offseason. It's been pretty pathetic since the season ended, other than the Gurriel signing.

  13. #3901
    Top 100 Prospect
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    671
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wamco View Post
    Aren't Flores and Duda still on the mets for 1b ?
    Yes, Smoak would be redundant for the Mets, but Bruce is already redundant for the Mets too. Logic would be take the cheaper useless piece, I guess.
    Smoak at 4+4 may be easier to swallow on their payroll than Bruce at 13+0. It's +9 savings this year and -4 next year, but even if they have to hold Smoaky all year, they may be able to sneak him into a deal next offseason as a salary offload since $4 million is a bit easier to sneak into a deal. It's hard for a team to absorb $13, but $4 is doable.

  14. #3902
    MVP
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,339
    Thanks
    215
    Thanked 642 Times in 510 Posts
    If they have to take Smoak for 2 years the difference is just 5 Mil.

  15. #3903
    Top 100 Prospect
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    403
    Thanks
    125
    Thanked 189 Times in 92 Posts

  16. #3904
    Blue Chip Prospect LGBJ29's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,272
    Thanks
    158
    Thanked 289 Times in 175 Posts
    They're gearing up to sign Joe Inglett to a minor league deal

  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LGBJ29 For This Useful Post:

    TheGrandslamMan (01-12-2017),TholesWeirdEye (01-10-2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •