• TB 5
    BAL 8
    Final
    1:10 PM ET
  • MIA 4
    CHC 2
    Final
    1:10 PM ET
  • CLE 0
    MIN 4
    Final
    1:10 PM ET
  • WSH 2
    CIN 6
    Final
    1:35 PM ET
  • BOS 2
    LAA 4
    Final
    1:35 PM ET
  • ATL 0
    MIL 7
    Final
    1:35 PM ET
  • NYY 6
    TEX 7
    Final
    2:05 PM ET
  • CWS 3
    OAK 5
    Final
    2:10 PM ET
  • KC 2
    TOR 8
    Final
    2:15 PM ET
  • SF 2
    NYM 8
    Final
    4:05 PM ET
  • LAD 12
    COL 6
    Final
    4:10 PM ET
  • SEA 2
    HOU 8
    Final
    4:10 PM ET
  • ARI 2
    PHI 1
    Final
    4:10 PM ET
  • SD 5
    DET 7
    Final
    4:40 PM ET
  • STL 2
    PIT 4
    In Progress
    Bottom 6th
Page 244 of 309 FirstFirst ... 144194234242243244245246254294 ... LastLast
Results 3,889 to 3,904 of 4929

Thread: Offseason Roster Thread 2016-17

  1. #3889
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,498
    Thanks
    216
    Thanked 644 Times in 513 Posts
    I hate Bruce more than anyone Average bat with horrible D but even I would agree with a move that would bring a prospect back and get rid of that lug Smoak

  2. #3890
    MVP
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    10,044
    Thanks
    464
    Thanked 2,169 Times in 1,620 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ziggyy108 View Post
    I would take Bruce + a prospect for Smoak
    I'd probably do Bruce for Smoak straight up. You'd be getting Bruce for just under 9M this year, plus saving Smoak's 4M next year.

  3. #3891
    Top 100 Prospect
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    677
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 41 Times in 35 Posts
    Aren't Flores and Duda still on the mets for 1b ?

  4. #3892
    Top 100 Prospect
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    394
    Thanks
    23
    Thanked 97 Times in 64 Posts
    They did lose James Loney at 1B, and he's pretty comparable to Smoak. Except Smoak is a switch hitter. I can see the Mets taking him for depth.

  5. #3893
    All Star
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    4,267
    Thanks
    274
    Thanked 902 Times in 606 Posts
    Smoak for Bruce would be a good deal. At least Bruce can actually hit RHP.

  6. #3894
    MVP Stangstag's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    7,332
    Thanks
    254
    Thanked 1,436 Times in 976 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Abomination View Post
    I'd probably do Bruce for Smoak straight up. You'd be getting Bruce for just under 9M this year, plus saving Smoak's 4M next year.
    Same. Bruce is actually a useful lefty bat who can play the OF (albeit, very poorly). Much more useful to this team than Justin Smoak.

  7. #3895
    Top 100 Prospect
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    677
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 41 Times in 35 Posts
    Why do the mets need a 1bman

  8. #3896
    Hall of Famer Atothe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    14,360
    Thanks
    2,788
    Thanked 1,915 Times in 1,346 Posts
    You guys wanna add a horrible defender who is making more money than the guy you're trading? I'd rather roll with Carrera

  9. #3897
    Hall of Famer Atothe's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    14,360
    Thanks
    2,788
    Thanked 1,915 Times in 1,346 Posts
    Jays should just wait until 25 man rosters have to be set and make a trade then

  10. #3898
    Blue Chip Prospect
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Posts
    1,001
    Thanks
    91
    Thanked 464 Times in 254 Posts
    I don't want Bruce under any circumstance I can think of.

  11. #3899
    Big Leaguer reedjohnsonfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    2,543
    Thanks
    218
    Thanked 294 Times in 221 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Atothe View Post
    You guys wanna add a horrible defender who is making more money than the guy you're trading? I'd rather roll with Carrera
    Ya, Bruce is trash IMO. 30 HR and not much else.

  12. #3900
    Big Leaguer reedjohnsonfan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    2,543
    Thanks
    218
    Thanked 294 Times in 221 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by MikeM View Post
    I don't want Bruce under any circumstance I can think of.
    If they're giving him away maybe he's worth a look as a last resort. But in no way should they get him, a couple relievers (not the ones who signed) and think they had a successful offseason. It's been pretty pathetic since the season ended, other than the Gurriel signing.

  13. #3901
    Top 100 Prospect
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    691
    Thanks
    12
    Thanked 124 Times in 82 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wamco View Post
    Aren't Flores and Duda still on the mets for 1b ?
    Yes, Smoak would be redundant for the Mets, but Bruce is already redundant for the Mets too. Logic would be take the cheaper useless piece, I guess.
    Smoak at 4+4 may be easier to swallow on their payroll than Bruce at 13+0. It's +9 savings this year and -4 next year, but even if they have to hold Smoaky all year, they may be able to sneak him into a deal next offseason as a salary offload since $4 million is a bit easier to sneak into a deal. It's hard for a team to absorb $13, but $4 is doable.

  14. #3902
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,498
    Thanks
    216
    Thanked 644 Times in 513 Posts
    If they have to take Smoak for 2 years the difference is just 5 Mil.

  15. #3903
    Top 100 Prospect
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    409
    Thanks
    202
    Thanked 193 Times in 94 Posts

  16. #3904
    Blue Chip Prospect LGBJ29's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,449
    Thanks
    172
    Thanked 360 Times in 217 Posts
    They're gearing up to sign Joe Inglett to a minor league deal

  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to LGBJ29 For This Useful Post:

    TheGrandslamMan (01-12-2017),TholesWeirdEye (01-10-2017)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •