• PHI
    COL
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • NYY
    KC
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • BAL
    MIN
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • CHC
    SF
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • WSH
    SEA
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • CIN
    CLE
    Preview
    7:10 PM ET
  • TB
    LAA
    Preview
    7:10 PM ET
  • NYM
    SD
    Preview
    7:10 PM ET
  • BOS
    TEX
    Preview
    7:10 PM ET
  • ATL
    PIT
    Preview
    7:35 PM ET
  • MIL
    TOR
    Preview
    7:40 PM ET
  • HOU
    DET
    Preview
    8:10 PM ET
  • ARI
    CWS
    Preview
    9:40 PM ET
  • OAK
    MIA
    Preview
    10:05 PM ET
  • LAD
    STL
    Preview
    10:10 PM ET
Page 65 of 71 FirstFirst ... 15556364656667 ... LastLast
Results 1,025 to 1,040 of 1121

Thread: The Jose Bautista Thread

  1. #1025
    DONOR Angrioter's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    D_R
    Posts
    24,169
    Thanks
    1,722
    Thanked 5,322 Times in 3,201 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by rydermike View Post
    FO wants to give no more than QO and Bautista wants 1 year for more than QO. Maybe they can compromise and do 1 yr/ QO + bonuses. And bonuses can go up to $20 depending on metrics used. Gives Baustista the deal he wants since if he is as good as he believes, he should get the $20 and if Bautista is as good as the FO believes he gets QO, but if he's better than they believe he gets $20.
    I don't think so. 1 or 2 millions isn't the difference here.
    New FO don't want Jose. It's time to move forward

  2. #1026
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,498
    Thanks
    216
    Thanked 644 Times in 513 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Angrioter View Post
    I don't think so. 1 or 2 millions isn't the difference here.
    New FO don't want Jose. It's time to move forward
    Seems to me they are afraid to spend Rogers money. There was the offer to Fowler but it was probably made knowing it would get rejected

  3. #1027
    All Star Jimcanuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    6,645
    Thanks
    273
    Thanked 866 Times in 655 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Angrioter View Post
    I don't think so. 1 or 2 millions isn't the difference here.
    New FO don't want Jose. It's time to move forward
    This.

    A 1 year deal makes no sense when the value of the pick is factored in, and the FO wants no part of Jose on a multi year contract with his 10/5 rights.

  4. #1028
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Posts
    10,498
    Thanks
    216
    Thanked 644 Times in 513 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimcanuck View Post
    This.

    A 1 year deal makes no sense when the value of the pick is factored in, and the FO wants no part of Jose on a multi year contract with his 10/5 rights.
    You do have to be willing to take some risks. Can't sit on your butt all offseason unwilling to pull the trigger

    If I had to guess we are ending up empty handed here with a few more minor league deals and a bag full of excuses

  5. #1029
    Top 100 Prospect intrigid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Posts
    470
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 89 Times in 55 Posts
    Why I waited this long to put RA on ignore, I have no idea.

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to intrigid For This Useful Post:

    Brownie19 (01-08-2017),Krylian (01-09-2017),Mikeleelop (01-08-2017),TholesWeirdEye (01-09-2017)

  7. #1030
    Moderator Governator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Barrie
    Posts
    10,538
    Thanks
    2,798
    Thanked 4,811 Times in 2,202 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by RealAccountant View Post
    Seems to me they are afraid to spend Rogers money. There was the offer to Fowler but it was probably made knowing it would get rejected
    Quote Originally Posted by RealAccountant View Post
    You do have to be willing to take some risks. Can't sit on your butt all offseason unwilling to pull the trigger

    If I had to guess we are ending up empty handed here with a few more minor league deals and a bag full of excuses
    Quote Originally Posted by Stangstag View Post
    The Governator is a man's man.

  8. The Following 14 Users Say Thank You to Governator For This Useful Post:

    baubau (01-08-2017),Brownie19 (01-08-2017),BTS (01-08-2017),Candy Maldonado (01-08-2017),Dr. Dinger (01-08-2017),fatcowxlive (01-09-2017),glory (01-09-2017),jays4life19 (01-08-2017),Krylian (01-09-2017),Maahfaace (01-09-2017),Mikeleelop (01-08-2017),Pendleton (01-08-2017),Spanky99 (01-08-2017),THANOS (01-09-2017)

  9. #1031
    All Star Brownie19's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Wasaga Beach
    Posts
    4,572
    Thanks
    1,500
    Thanked 1,146 Times in 767 Posts
    How many bans do you need before it's permanent?

    I guess he'll just come back under a different user name and it will be more of a pain in the ass?

  10. #1032
    DONOR Angrioter's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    D_R
    Posts
    24,169
    Thanks
    1,722
    Thanked 5,322 Times in 3,201 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimcanuck View Post
    This.

    A 1 year deal makes no sense when the value of the pick is factored in, and the FO wants no part of Jose on a multi year contract with his 10/5 rights.
    We need that fucking draft pick. Our farm suxxxx as hell.

    In Shapiro we trust.

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Angrioter For This Useful Post:

    Ehjays (01-09-2017)

  12. #1033
    Moderator KingKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    16,623
    Thanks
    13,682
    Thanked 5,699 Times in 3,655 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Angrioter View Post
    We need that fucking draft pick. Our farm suxxxx as hell.
    If none of the other teams are willing to sign Jose until June than the draft is for all practical purposes already lost and shouldn't factor in the decision making process.
    "We don't have to plan for a rebuild. But all 30 teams have to stay agile, and have to understand that we're dealing with human beings, and these assets to organizations are human and change and evolve. I think what we've tried to do is become more flexible and agile, and to sustain championships is to build from within."

  13. The Following User Says Thank You to KingKat For This Useful Post:

    Governator (01-09-2017)

  14. #1034
    Blue Chip Prospect CHRIS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    1,341
    Thanks
    275
    Thanked 481 Times in 273 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimcanuck View Post
    This.

    A 1 year deal makes no sense when the value of the pick is factored in, and the FO wants no part of Jose on a multi year contract with his 10/5 rights.
    I think a 1-year deal still makes sense if Bautista helps this team win/compete/contend for 2017.

    Having an extra pick would be really nice, but there are still enough pieces here to make a run in 2017.

    I am not in favour of a recklessly trying to improve this team for 2017 for the sake of appearances, but I don't think the team should outright dismiss a 1-year deal just because of the pick. If we need that pick so badly, we should probably just blow the whole thing up.

    That said, entertaining a 1-year deal for Bautista is contingent on the idea that he is healthy and able to bounce back. It continues to seem that the FO does not believe this to be the case, or there's some other negative factor about him that outweighs whatever value he brings to the field.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to CHRIS For This Useful Post:

    Spanky99 (01-09-2017)

  16. #1035
    Hall of Famer burlingtonbandit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    15,981
    Thanks
    688
    Thanked 1,963 Times in 1,421 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by KingKat View Post
    If none of the other teams are willing to sign Jose until June than the draft is for all practical purposes already lost and shouldn't factor in the decision making process.
    Also good chance you could trade him for more than what the draft picks is worth if he has a decent first half.

  17. #1036
    Top 100 Prospect
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    331
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 10 Times in 9 Posts
    The question is if JB waits till June/July till the draft pick is off the table,and he will be picked up by someone in the run for Oct. Does he get a multi year contract?

  18. #1037
    All Star Brownie19's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Wasaga Beach
    Posts
    4,572
    Thanks
    1,500
    Thanked 1,146 Times in 767 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by burlingtonbandit View Post
    Also good chance you could trade him for more than what the draft picks is worth if he has a decent first half.
    10-5

    10-5

    10-5

  19. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Brownie19 For This Useful Post:

    BTS (01-09-2017),fatcowxlive (01-09-2017),Gen.Disarray (01-09-2017),Pendleton (01-09-2017),Spanky99 (01-09-2017)

  20. #1038
    All Star
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    4,164
    Thanks
    268
    Thanked 880 Times in 590 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by burlingtonbandit View Post
    Also good chance you could trade him for more than what the draft picks is worth if he has a decent first half.
    He would have a NTC (10/5 rights) if he signed with the Jays. Not that easy.

  21. #1039
    Hall of Famer burlingtonbandit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    15,981
    Thanks
    688
    Thanked 1,963 Times in 1,421 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Brownie19 View Post
    10-5

    10-5

    10-5
    If the Blue Jays are out of it and selling everyone off then he probably wouldn't mind going to a contender either. Other scenario is the Blue Jays are good and he helps the team try to get to the playoffs.

  22. #1040
    All Star Krylian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    4,225
    Thanks
    542
    Thanked 1,146 Times in 771 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Brownie19 View Post
    10-5

    10-5

    10-5
    I know it doesn't...but logically, 10-5 rights really shouldn't apply as he's technically a free agent now and has no affiliation with the Blue Jays. Why should the clock continue? I understand if he signed an extension before his contract expired, hence continuous service time with the team...but realistically, if he's not under contract with the team, why does the clock continue?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •