• PHI
    COL
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • NYY
    KC
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • BAL
    MIN
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • CHC
    SF
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • WSH
    SEA
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • CIN
    CLE
    Preview
    7:10 PM ET
  • TB
    LAA
    Preview
    7:10 PM ET
  • NYM
    SD
    Preview
    7:10 PM ET
  • BOS
    TEX
    Preview
    7:10 PM ET
  • ATL
    PIT
    Preview
    7:35 PM ET
  • MIL
    TOR
    Preview
    7:40 PM ET
  • HOU
    DET
    Preview
    8:10 PM ET
  • ARI
    CWS
    Preview
    9:40 PM ET
  • OAK
    MIA
    Preview
    10:05 PM ET
  • LAD
    STL
    Preview
    10:10 PM ET
Page 67 of 71 FirstFirst ... 17576566676869 ... LastLast
Results 1,057 to 1,072 of 1121

Thread: The Jose Bautista Thread

  1. #1057
    Hall of Famer burlingtonbandit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    15,981
    Thanks
    688
    Thanked 1,963 Times in 1,421 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobthe4th View Post
    With the second wildcard we'd have to be epically bad (unlikely without injuries to one or more of the pitchers + a position player like Donaldson/Martin) to be selling everyone. A .500 team still has a good chance of a wildcard.

    I do think that if we are around .500 we'd shop Estrada, and if Gurriel / Urena is considered ready, maybe we'd shop Tulo too. I seriously doubt we'll be entering full rebuild mode though.
    I doubt Tulo gets shopped, he's got a full NTC and I think he'd be one of the last guys to be traded if they're out of it. I think they sell if they're more than 3 GB of the wildcard. Lots of pieces would be moved.

    Estrada, Happ, Liriano, Grilli, Upton, Pearce, Donaldson would likely all be moved.

  2. #1058
    Blue Chip Prospect Bobthe4th's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Leeds (England)
    Posts
    1,279
    Thanks
    135
    Thanked 264 Times in 180 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by burlingtonbandit View Post
    I doubt Tulo gets shopped, he's got a full NTC and I think he'd be one of the last guys to be traded if they're out of it. I think they sell if they're more than 3 GB of the wildcard. Lots of pieces would be moved.

    Estrada, Happ, Liriano, Grilli, Upton, Pearce, Donaldson would likely all be moved.
    Sorry, I maybe misunderstanding you, but are to trying to suggest Donaldson gets traded if at the deadline we are more than 3 games out of a wildcard place?

    3 games is nothing, that can be caught up in less than a week.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Bobthe4th For This Useful Post:

    Spanky99 (01-09-2017)

  4. #1059
    Hall of Famer burlingtonbandit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    15,981
    Thanks
    688
    Thanked 1,963 Times in 1,421 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobthe4th View Post
    Sorry, I maybe misunderstanding you, but are to trying to suggest Donaldson gets traded if at the deadline we are more than 3 games out of a wildcard place?

    3 games is nothing, that can be caught up in less than a week.
    I think the FO would certainly listen. If there are say 3 team between the Jays and the 2nd place wildcard then a 4 Game lead is quite a bit. Obviously a bunch of factors go into it like injuries up until that point and what teams are offering in return but trading JD makes sense if you aren't going to sign him long term.

  5. The Following User Says Thank You to burlingtonbandit For This Useful Post:

    Bobthe4th (01-09-2017)

  6. #1060
    Blue Chip Prospect Bobthe4th's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Leeds (England)
    Posts
    1,279
    Thanks
    135
    Thanked 264 Times in 180 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by burlingtonbandit View Post
    I think the FO would certainly listen. If there are say 3 team between the Jays and the 2nd place wildcard then a 4 Game lead is quite a bit. Obviously a bunch of factors go into it like injuries up until that point and what teams are offering in return but trading JD makes sense if you aren't going to sign him long term.
    Thanks, that's much more reasonable.

    Hopefully it won't be an issue anyway, and we'll be right in the mix for the playoffs.

  7. #1061
    All Star Jimcanuck's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    6,645
    Thanks
    273
    Thanked 866 Times in 655 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobthe4th View Post
    Sorry, I maybe misunderstanding you, but are to trying to suggest Donaldson gets traded if at the deadline we are more than 3 games out of a wildcard place?

    3 games is nothing, that can be caught up in less than a week.
    The Jays are a team in decline with aging vets. If they have 3/4 teams ahead of them at the deadline, hard to see how retaining JD makes sense, by the time Jays have reloaded JD will be what, 35/36?

    I find it hard to see the Jays as WS contenders in 2017, the competition is just so much stronger.

  8. #1062
    All Star Terminator's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    5,766
    Thanks
    1,946
    Thanked 1,817 Times in 1,125 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimcanuck View Post
    The Jays are a team in decline with aging vets. If they have 3/4 teams ahead of them at the deadline, hard to see how retaining JD makes sense, by the time Jays have reloaded JD will be what, 35/36?

    I find it hard to see the Jays as WS contenders in 2017, the competition is just so much stronger.
    It didn't have to be this way. With an aggressive offseason the Jays would have out positioned everyone in the division (other than the Red Sox) for at least next season and possibly the next two. I have no idea what the FO is doing right now. Seems like they are playing both sides of the coin. They don't want to go all-in but at the same time they are locking up 34 year olds to multi-year deals. It's been a frustrating offseason to say the least. Here's to hoping they can pull a rabbit out of their hat before it's over.

  9. #1063
    Hall of Famer NJH's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    15,247
    Thanks
    1,128
    Thanked 8,094 Times in 4,530 Posts
    I wouldn't take Bautista back if he paid us!

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to NJH For This Useful Post:

    Ehjays (01-10-2017),Krylian (01-10-2017),Nafro (01-10-2017)

  11. #1064
    Top 100 Prospect
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    349
    Thanks
    22
    Thanked 82 Times in 55 Posts
    I found it funny that the only team that Matt Holliday had on his NTC when he signed with the Yanks was Oakland. Guess he likes having free soda.

    Quote Originally Posted by BTS View Post
    I don't really believe that Bautista is running any risk of sitting out until June. Some team with either a protected 1st, or a 1st that's already been forfeited, is going to bite at at least 1/15.
    I think I might riot if we don't get Bautista for 1/15. Bautista at his best is worth more than a 30-something overall draft pick. Theres no reason we shouldn't get Bautista on a 1 year + 1 team option deal at this point

  12. #1065
    Big Leaguer
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Shakespeare, ON
    Posts
    1,990
    Thanks
    1,165
    Thanked 449 Times in 285 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Ray View Post
    I found it funny that the only team that Matt Holliday had on his NTC when he signed with the Yanks was Oakland. Guess he likes having free soda.



    I think I might riot if we don't get Bautista for 1/15. Bautista at his best is worth more than a 30-something overall draft pick. Theres no reason we shouldn't get Bautista on a 1 year + 1 team option deal at this point
    So let me get this straight. You would rather pay Bautista 15 million to put up numbers likely somewhere between last year and 2015. (His strikeouts will go up).? If he plays the outfield, he's going to cost you 5-15 Runs? You would rather do that, then pay someone less money, to provide the same value. Oh and you wouldn't want Thor or Aaron Sanchez? Both were sandwich round picks.

    That being said, I would probably sign Bautista for 1-15, if he plays at least half the game's at DH, with Morales playing first.

  13. #1066
    Orioles Hangout Admin Boxcar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    20,353
    Thanks
    1,904
    Thanked 7,285 Times in 4,543 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Nafro View Post
    So let me get this straight. You would rather pay Bautista 15 million to put up numbers likely somewhere between last year and 2015. (His strikeouts will go up).? If he plays the outfield, he's going to cost you 5-15 Runs? You would rather do that, then pay someone less money, to provide the same value. Oh and you wouldn't want Thor or Aaron Sanchez? Both were sandwich round picks.

    That being said, I would probably sign Bautista for 1-15, if he plays at least half the game's at DH, with Morales playing first.
    Are you trolling? I can't tell.
    Quote Originally Posted by Grant77 View Post
    I think we all know it's the latter. The Mariners have been a disgustingly bad offensive for a decade now and nothing has changed.

  14. #1067
    All Star
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    4,164
    Thanks
    268
    Thanked 880 Times in 590 Posts
    Losing a pick for a one year player, especially when you can't recoup that pick next year due to the CBA change, is pretty significant. Unless Bautista is signing for Nelson Cruz 2014 money on a one year deal (factoring for inflation), which his ego won't allow him to, I'm not that interested. If it's one year + a team option or two, then we're talking.

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to glory For This Useful Post:

    Krylian (01-10-2017)

  16. #1068
    Orioles Hangout Admin Boxcar's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    20,353
    Thanks
    1,904
    Thanked 7,285 Times in 4,543 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by glory View Post
    Losing a pick for a one year player, especially when you can't recoup that pick next year due to the CBA change, is pretty significant. Unless Bautista is signing for Nelson Cruz 2014 money on a one year deal (factoring for inflation), which his ego won't allow him to, I'm not that interested. If it's one year + a team option or two, then we're talking.
    Where this team is right now, I'd rather have Bautista than a pick that has likely a 90% chance of amounting to nothing. I'd feel differently if there were other options.
    Quote Originally Posted by Grant77 View Post
    I think we all know it's the latter. The Mariners have been a disgustingly bad offensive for a decade now and nothing has changed.

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Boxcar For This Useful Post:

    Bobthe4th (01-10-2017),CHRIS (01-10-2017),Spanky99 (01-10-2017)

  18. #1069
    Hall of Famer burlingtonbandit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    15,981
    Thanks
    688
    Thanked 1,963 Times in 1,421 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by glory View Post
    Losing a pick for a one year player, especially when you can't recoup that pick next year due to the CBA change, is pretty significant. Unless Bautista is signing for Nelson Cruz 2014 money on a one year deal (factoring for inflation), which his ego won't allow him to, I'm not that interested. If it's one year + a team option or two, then we're talking.
    I'd rather have Bautista than any of the FA options left and it isn't even close. Even with crap defense a 3-4 Win season isn't unrealistic. Funny how no one cared about the pick when talking about Edwin while also giving him $80 Million.

  19. #1070
    All Star
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Posts
    4,164
    Thanks
    268
    Thanked 880 Times in 590 Posts
    I can see both sides. Jose could put up a 3 WAR season and help the Jays possibly get to the playoff picture again, so there's definitely value in that. I just think with the value of the pick being what it is that it makes more sense to go for a longer term, but then again, the longer term is less desirable for the team because of his age. That's why tacking on a team option would be the deal breaker for me. If it's a straight one year deal, and the cost is $17mm plus whatever you want to value the comp pick at ($8-10mm), that's a pretty sizable investment for a 36 year old with no D value.

  20. #1071
    All Star Krylian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    4,225
    Thanks
    542
    Thanked 1,146 Times in 771 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by burlingtonbandit View Post
    I'd rather have Bautista than any of the FA options left and it isn't even close. Even with crap defense a 3-4 Win season isn't unrealistic. Funny how no one cared about the pick when talking about Edwin while also giving him $80 Million.
    Eddie is likeable.

  21. #1072
    DONOR | Super Moderator G-Snarls's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    24,745
    Thanks
    1,661
    Thanked 3,708 Times in 2,499 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Krylian View Post
    Eddie is likeable.
    And, more importanly, a more reliable bat

    (Edwin's wRC+ has been better than Bautista's from 2014-2016)

    And 3-4 years younger
    Last edited by G-Snarls; 01-10-2017 at 12:32 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •