• MIL
    ARI
    Preview
    1:10 PM ET
  • MIN
    DET
    Preview
    1:10 PM ET
  • STL
    KC
    Preview
    1:15 PM ET
  • HOU
    SF
    Preview
    2:10 PM ET
  • WSH
    SD
    Preview
    4:05 PM ET
  • PHI
    ATL
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • TEX
    NYY
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • TOR
    LAA
    Preview
    7:07 PM ET
  • TB
    BOS
    Preview
    7:10 PM ET
  • NYM
    MIA
    Preview
    7:10 PM ET
  • CIN
    PIT
    Preview
    7:10 PM ET
  • CHC
    CLE
    Preview
    8:05 PM ET
  • CWS
    BAL
    Preview
    8:10 PM ET
  • OAK
    SEA
    Preview
    10:05 PM ET
  • LAD
    COL
    Preview
    10:10 PM ET
Page 4 of 180 FirstFirst ... 234561454104 ... LastLast
Results 49 to 64 of 2877

Thread: General 2017 Blue Jays Discussion Thread

  1. #49
    Hall of Famer KingKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    17,454
    Thanks
    14,593
    Thanked 6,031 Times in 3,856 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Governator View Post
    I really believe the Jays are fully waiting out Bautista at this point and will only sign him when they are 100% certain they aren't getting a comp pick for him in return and presumably still have the hole to fill. Maybe that's Feb. 1st or something but I'd reckon they have a timeline in mind. Honestly, if he waits it out until June I'll be disappointed that we didn't sign him. This talk about trading for Cutch as a bounceback candidate seems so redundant when we have Bautista available to us.
    If that's the case, shouldn't they insure themselves a bit against the possibility of Bautista going elsewhere? Angel Pagan is nobody's idea of a big signing but he can actually play the OF unlike Bautista these days. Pagan's a fit and he's just sitting there. Is it worth it to lift your nose at him just to wait out the possibility of signing Bautista?

  2. #50
    Blue Chip Prospect Sorrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Ottawa, ON
    Posts
    965
    Thanks
    175
    Thanked 270 Times in 186 Posts
    Andy Burns signs in the KBO freeing a spot on the 40 man roster and leaving is slightly less depthy on utility players.

    http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/cult...001700315.html

    Can't blame him, 50k signing bonus and 600k+ salary.

  3. #51
    All Star Pendleton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    4,694
    Thanks
    1,628
    Thanked 1,808 Times in 1,039 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sorrow View Post
    Andy Burns signs in the KBO freeing a spot on the 40 man roster and leaving is slightly less depthy on utility players.

    http://english.yonhapnews.co.kr/cult...001700315.html

    Can't blame him, 50k signing bonus and 600k+ salary.
    Probably would be a cool experience too.

  4. #52
    Hall of Famer KingKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    17,454
    Thanks
    14,593
    Thanked 6,031 Times in 3,856 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Sorrow View Post
    Andy Burns signs in the KBO freeing a spot on the 40 man roster and leaving is slightly less depthy on utility players.
    I don't think the hit on infield depth is all that significant. He's not that good and the Jays some good backups in place and some good depth through the system and with Pearse they have a guy who can shift between the OF and IF if needed and that really helps lengthen the bench.

  5. #53
    MVP Terminator's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    8,292
    Thanks
    2,520
    Thanked 2,697 Times in 1,660 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by KingKat View Post
    I don't think the hit on infield depth is all that significant. He's not that good and the Jays some good backups in place and some good depth through the system and with Pearse they have a guy who can shift between the OF and IF if needed and that really helps lengthen the bench.
    Yeah he was pathetic in AAA last year. I don't even think he's replacement level.

  6. #54
    All Star Brownie19's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Wasaga Beach
    Posts
    6,265
    Thanks
    2,041
    Thanked 1,751 Times in 1,141 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by KingKat View Post
    You're reaching... Blair's own ideas can be dumb as fuck but I'm pretty sure he's capable of relaying a rumor.
    Possibly. Let me hate on Blair in peace please.

  7. #55
    All Star THANOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Bowmanville, ON
    Posts
    4,897
    Thanks
    3,877
    Thanked 559 Times in 406 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by HERPDERP View Post
    Yeah... fuck that in its ass.

  8. #56
    Mod | DONOR BTS's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    26,812
    Thanks
    3,979
    Thanked 13,818 Times in 8,190 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by THANOS View Post
    Yeah... fuck that in its ass.
    You wouldn't trade Vlad for Cutch?
    jays4life19 ban counter: 3

  9. #57
    Hall of Famer KingKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    17,454
    Thanks
    14,593
    Thanked 6,031 Times in 3,856 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BTS View Post
    You wouldn't trade Vlad for Cutch?
    It's fine in a vacuum but do you really want to trade a guy with Vlad's upside at this juncture? I think that's more likely to set the franchise back than pay off.
    Last edited by KingKat; 01-09-2017 at 04:43 PM.

  10. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to KingKat For This Useful Post:

    LetTheBallFly (01-09-2017),Stangstag (01-09-2017),THANOS (01-09-2017)

  11. #58
    MVP Stangstag's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    7,346
    Thanks
    255
    Thanked 1,442 Times in 981 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BTS View Post
    You wouldn't trade Vlad for Cutch?
    I wouldn't. I'd rather sign one of the FA outfield options, or trade for a salary dump

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Stangstag For This Useful Post:

    THANOS (01-09-2017)

  13. #59
    All Star Krylian's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    5,575
    Thanks
    690
    Thanked 1,484 Times in 1,015 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BTS View Post
    You wouldn't trade Vlad for Cutch?
    Depends on what the goal is? If the goal is, field a competitive team in 2017 and be damned with the future, then I guess they would. But if they're looking to rebuild the core and have some young, controllable talent on the horizon, then no...you have to keep Junior and wait it out.

    For me, I keep him. I'd like to see a young core (Cubs) get built, and then augment that with veteran talent. I've been saying it for more than a decade. Built internally, then when you have a nice core established, bring in veteran leadership and talent to fill in some outstanding holes and round out the roster.

  14. #60
    DONOR Spanky99's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    44,714
    Thanks
    45,840
    Thanked 8,821 Times in 6,771 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by KingKat View Post
    I don't think the hit on infield depth is all that significant. He's not that good and the Jays some good backups in place and some good depth through the system and with Pearse they have a guy who can shift between the OF and IF if needed and that really helps lengthen the bench.
    *Pearce*

  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Spanky99 For This Useful Post:

    KingKat (01-09-2017)

  16. #61
    All Star Brownie19's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Wasaga Beach
    Posts
    6,265
    Thanks
    2,041
    Thanked 1,751 Times in 1,141 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Krylian View Post
    Depends on what the goal is? If the goal is, field a competitive team in 2017 and be damned with the future, then I guess they would. But if they're looking to rebuild the core and have some young, controllable talent on the horizon, then no...you have to keep Junior and wait it out.

    For me, I keep him. I'd like to see a young core (Cubs) get built, and then augment that with veteran talent. I've been saying it for more than a decade. Built internally, then when you have a nice core established, bring in veteran leadership and talent to fill in some outstanding holes and round out the roster.
    I'm curious to see if more teams start following the Cubs and draft/collect young positional players instead of pitchers. I get that pitching wins championships, but they are so f'ing volatile. Drafting positional players isn't a sure thing - but the rate of success of 1st and 2nd round positional players must be significantly higher than it is for pitchers. Increase the rate of success in your draft and use them and FA money to sign/trade for pitchers when the time is right.

  17. #62
    Hall of Famer burlingtonbandit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    16,963
    Thanks
    721
    Thanked 2,169 Times in 1,552 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BTS View Post
    You wouldn't trade Vlad for Cutch?
    I'd rather just sign Bautista for a little bit more money and keep Vlad.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to burlingtonbandit For This Useful Post:

    THANOS (01-09-2017)

  19. #63
    Hall of Famer burlingtonbandit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Posts
    16,963
    Thanks
    721
    Thanked 2,169 Times in 1,552 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Brownie19 View Post
    I'm curious to see if more teams start following the Cubs and draft/collect young positional players instead of pitchers. I get that pitching wins championships, but they are so f'ing volatile. Drafting positional players isn't a sure thing - but the rate of success of 1st and 2nd round positional players must be significantly higher than it is for pitchers. Increase the rate of success in your draft and use them and FA money to sign/trade for pitchers when the time is right.
    I think we are starting to see it with trades. More teams are reluctant to trade their top position player prospects but seem not to concerned with the pitching prospects. WSH kept Robbles and out of the big trades the White Sox made 4 of the best 5 prospects were pitchers.

    The Cubs and Astros paved the way by targeting position players.

  20. #64
    Hall of Famer Orgfiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    21,232
    Thanks
    4,031
    Thanked 5,326 Times in 3,368 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by KingKat View Post
    It's fine in a vacuum but do you really want to trade a guy with Vlad's upside at this juncture? I think that's more likely to set the franchise back than pay off.
    Vlad's upside is nice, but he's super far away, and there are already big question marks about his future position. He's likely to never provide the kind of value that McCutchen will provide in the next two years. There's a chance you trade him and that he becomes a spittin image of Vlad Sr. yes, but the odds are strongly against him. There's plenty of big name IFA signings with prodigious power and seemingly excellent bat to ball skills that flamed out. If the Pirates offer you McCutchen for Vlad Jr. + Matt Smoral and some other C or D level prospect I think you take it and run.
    Quote Originally Posted by LetTheBallFly View Post
    Synder is mediocre at best this year. Let me know when Synder is giving up less runs per game than Sanchez, until then I'll take Sanchez



Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •