• PHI
    COL
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • NYY
    KC
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • BAL
    MIN
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • CHC
    SF
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • WSH
    SEA
    Preview
    7:05 PM ET
  • CIN
    CLE
    Preview
    7:10 PM ET
  • TB
    LAA
    Preview
    7:10 PM ET
  • NYM
    SD
    Preview
    7:10 PM ET
  • BOS
    TEX
    Preview
    7:10 PM ET
  • ATL
    PIT
    Preview
    7:35 PM ET
  • MIL
    TOR
    Preview
    7:40 PM ET
  • HOU
    DET
    Preview
    8:10 PM ET
  • ARI
    CWS
    Preview
    9:40 PM ET
  • OAK
    MIA
    Preview
    10:05 PM ET
  • LAD
    STL
    Preview
    10:10 PM ET
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 33 to 35 of 35

Thread: Neil Ramirez DFA'd

  1. #33
    Moderator KingKat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2013
    Posts
    16,623
    Thanks
    13,682
    Thanked 5,699 Times in 3,655 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by BTS View Post
    I don't really care about this either way because they'll probably both be out of the majors by 2019, but I don't understand what risk you see with optioning Tepera to make room for a guy who might (and might not) be a bit better than Tepera but who doesn't have options. That's exactly what options are for and how teams use them: to yo-yo marginal players back and forth from AAA to suit their needs. Taking a flier on Ramirez is absolutely a valid reason for optioning Tepera. I mean, it's Ryan Tepera.
    The obvious risk is that Ramirez could be a lot worse than Tepera who is at least mediocre. If Tepera was at the bottom of the pecking order, you'd have the luxury (though I'm not sure I would advocate using it) of not caring about Tepera but because Biagini is in the rotation, because Grilli and Howell are gas-canning it up, Tepera is a guy who is out there protecting leads. Even if he's no better than mediocre that doesn't mean it makes sense to hand his job to a project. I get that Ramirez has upside but we've been down that road before. Jeremy Jeffress had potential, that doesn't mean it was worth it to throw him out there because eventually someone would capitalize on his talent. Unless you have strong reason to believe he can provide an immediate improvement over Tepera (and there's no particular reason to believe that), the prudent move is to try to get him to the mimors and develop him there and if he doesn't clear, you move on. You can't capitalize on every uspide play that's out there. Sometimes you have to just le the Jeremy Jeffress and the Neil Ramirezes of the world go.
    "We don't have to plan for a rebuild. But all 30 teams have to stay agile, and have to understand that we're dealing with human beings, and these assets to organizations are human and change and evolve. I think what we've tried to do is become more flexible and agile, and to sustain championships is to build from within."

  2. #34
    Blue Chip Prospect Bobthe4th's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Leeds (England)
    Posts
    1,285
    Thanks
    136
    Thanked 265 Times in 181 Posts

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Bobthe4th For This Useful Post:

    Spanky99 (05-14-2017)

  4. #35
    MVP Jonn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    In Shambles
    Posts
    13,451
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1,659 Times in 1,171 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Bobthe4th View Post
    Lame.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •